Rabidape VS VenomFangX on Retroviruses

	Duration: 07:43 minutes Upload Time: 07-06-10 22:50:11 User: g0at :::: Favorites
Description: Kind of loud at the start sorry Ahhh venom... Rabids Video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cApX69vyhg0 Venoms Response http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5eaZ8vsv7w&watch_response And my frustration found here.... 1. Male nipples. 2. Male uterus (yes you read that right) 3. Thirteenth rib ( in 8% of people) 4. Coccyx 5. Wisdom teeth 6. Appendix 7. Body hair (left over from our evolutionary ancestry) 8. Goose bumps. (body hair ancestry left overs) 9. Extrinsic ear muscles. 10. Third eyelid (retained in corner of our eye as a tiny fold of flesh).
Comments
Arcanavii ::: Favorites LOL! 07-08-27 21:24:03 _____________________________________________________
rasia22 ::: Favorites your statements are non sense... 07-08-19 03:28:27 _____________________________________________________
drlawitts ::: Favorites i like the nose pick 07-08-18 07:14:52 _____________________________________________________
thisisaproxy ::: Favorites @PTCernunnos: The CMB radiation is measured to fill the entire universe, whereas the radiation from supernova is local to that event. 07-08-13 00:36:58 _____________________________________________________
eepwwtppwe ::: Favorites the odds of one retrovirus affecting a part of our genome and the same place in the genomes in apes and chimps isn't 1 in 3 billion. its actually one in 2.7x10^28, or the number 27 followed by 27 zeros. its way less than 1 in 3billion 07-08-17 23:21:37 _____________________________________________________
PTCernunnos ::: Favorites I seriously doubt we will ever have enough knowledge to know for sure how things started (if there was a start at all, and not a step in a endless cycle), and i seriously doubt we will ever find any evidence that can prove the big bang wrong (because the big bang is such an "adaptable" theory), but still im a suporter of staying open, so that we dont do what our ancestors did to some of the greatest genious of our past. 07-08-07 17:48:17 _____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
PTCernunnos ::: Favorites i never said the big bang is not believable, those things u call "evidence" are real things we observed and the formulated a theory about them, 1 theory out of million possible theories noone ever though of because everyone is taught the big bang theory is 100% accurate, therefor limiting creativity and any possibility of creating a diferent theory that fits the same "evidence" 07-08-07 17:08:22 _____________________________________________________
PTCernunnos ::: Favorites most of the "evidence" fit with manny other theories, like for example, the universe is expanding now till it reaches a limit, then it will compact again until enough matter creates an explosion (a lot less matter than the big bang idea, fits better with fusion and other modern theories about matter) wich will restart the cycle, looks like big bang but doesnt shoot down all other theories about matter. 07-08-07 17:03:38 _____________________________________________________
StealthDonkey007 ::: Favorites I know that much of the evidence fits with some other theories that people could dream up, but what must be kept in mind is that much of this evidence was found after the big bang theory was thought up. The evidence found matched with predictions made by the theory, which is huge support for it. It is possible that another theory could be dreamed up that fits the evidence better, and that predicts future discoveries more accurately. But I have yet to see one. 07-08-07 17:41:43 _____________________________________________________
PTCernunnos ::: Favorites and the more u believe the big bang is the "best" theory the less probably it is a new better theory will come up. thinking up theories is not only about scientific fact, because the fact we own is limited to say the least, its a lot about creativity aswell, u have to fill huge amounts of "voids", and u have to think outside the box, u have to put aside a perfectly good theory to be able to create a new one. 07-08-07 17:44:21 _____________________________________________________
StealthDonkey007 ::: Favorites Luckily, I don't work in any fields related to the big bang. I agree, people must always question the accepted knowledge, but those people should know what they're doing. I know enough about the big bang to argue for it (poorly), but I'm not actively engaged in research in that field. If I was, then yes, I'd be looking into various other theories, and trying to think up ones that fit better. 07-08-07 17:52:16 _____________________________________________________
PTCernunnos ::: Favorites only when we find something that doesnt fit the big bang will we be able to put it apart, and that will not happen, the big bang is a suposed event of unbelievable magnitude, that happened manny billions of years ago, in some place billions of kilometers away, its a very flexible theory because its a very vague theory, the amount of knowledge needed to prove the big bang wrong is "god like", humanity will probably be extint before we get there, u and me will be extint for sure :) 07-08-07 17:59:20 _____________________________________________________
StealthDonkey007 ::: Favorites Your right, but I think it is for a different reason. The big bang theory fits pretty much every piece of observed data we have found. It was definitely falsifiable when it was conceived, but since then so much evidence has confirmed it. To falsify it we would need many new pieces of evidence. In all probability if a new piece of evidence is found that contradicts the big bang, it is more likely that the theory will be tweaked then thrown out. But only because everything else fits so well. 07-08-07 18:38:17 _____________________________________________________
PTCernunnos ::: Favorites the big bang theory has fitted every piece of evidence observed after it was conceived exactly because its such a vague theory, just about everything can fit, not because we got the theory right, but because we chose a theory that is pretty much unbreakable :) for example, if u say "the theory of time says time is something" every piece of data we collect about time will fit that theory, doesnt mean the theory is exact :) 07-08-07 19:09:03 _____________________________________________________
StealthDonkey007 ::: Favorites Many things have been predicted that were found to be true, background radiation for example. I guess you do have a point, but the more we find out the less vague the theory gets. 07-08-07 19:19:13 _____________________________________________________
PTCernunnos ::: Favorites thats because the theory is adapting to what we find and not because what the theory said from the begining is being confirmed :) that is the nature of vague theories, only way to prove the big bang wrong is by proving there was no explosion, thats the single binding argument of the theory, basicaly were doing the "ridicule" test, we pick a possibility, go on with it until we find a ridicule result, in this case that possible ridicule result is far from our reach 07-08-07 20:09:35 _____________________________________________________
StealthDonkey007 ::: Favorites No, the background radiation was a specific prediction of the big bang theory, before it was found. The big bang theory would have been in serious trouble had it not been found. But it was found, and all was well. 07-08-07 20:20:41 _____________________________________________________
PTCernunnos ::: Favorites Background radiation is the fruit of an explosion, it can be explained by other things, stuff explode in the universe every day, we know almost nothing about the universe, our tools, knowledge and range is extremely limited. Im sure the theory would have made it if we didnt find that radiation, the theory would not make it if we find there was no big explosion. 07-08-08 06:28:43 _____________________________________________________
StealthDonkey007 ::: Favorites Yeah, the background radiation could be explained other ways, but all I am saying is that it was a prediction made, which was found to be true. This is the best kind of evidence for a theory. 07-08-08 07:45:43 _____________________________________________________
PTCernunnos ::: Favorites it is the best kind of evidence, but it is still extremely vague, long before the big bang theory was created we alrdy knew about super novas for example, wich pretty much trivializes the prediction of background radiation :) 07-08-09 16:09:41 _____________________________________________________