 |
Duration: 05:50 minutes Upload Time: 2007-12-07 17:11:47 User: liamrokocoko :::: Favorites :::: Top Videos of Day |
|
Description: Graham Henry re-appointed All Blacks coach, on a two year deal. |
|
Comments | |
| chipnchase23 ::: Favorites 2007-12-20 15:39:44 I'm one person...not everyone. But we didn't play any hard games. __________________________________________________ | |
| Joelberg11 ::: Favorites 2007-12-20 08:03:39 you should never need more than a few hard games to hit your straps regardless of the level. its funny how not long ago people were complaining they play to much rugby now all of a sudden we dont play enough games. __________________________________________________ | |
| chipnchase23 ::: Favorites 2007-12-19 15:21:43 Different era my friend. In 1987 Rugby was no more than an amateur sport. These days in the professional era for players to compete at such a competitive level where anybody can beat anybody players need the chance to be able to peak. For example did Dan Carter look as good as he was in the Lions Tour? No. __________________________________________________ | |
| Joelberg11 ::: Favorites 2007-12-19 11:01:55 i never said i laid all the blame on the players i said alot. they played more competitive rugby than they played before the 1987 world cup. thats a load of bullshit theres no way you should need to play 50 games to win one game its all a load of excuses for a poor performance. if you cant get to your peak by training nearly every day then playing in the end of the super 14, playing tri nations, 3 one off tests then pool games in the world cup then theres something wrong. __________________________________________________ | |
| chipnchase23 ::: Favorites 2007-12-18 15:10:51 Funny, thats what I said. Why do you blame the players? Now thats a blind opinion. And you'll say, hey they were the ones playing the game, but when you don't play any competitive Rugby for a whole season how can you expect to run out and win a WC? Who do you blame for that decision? __________________________________________________ | |
| Joelberg11 ::: Favorites 2007-12-18 08:07:15 luckly blind opinions dont sway the descisions. its easy to place the blame on the coaches. i lay alot of the blame on the players you can't say they didnt have match fitness with the ridiclous amount of games they play these days. there all excuses but in the end of the day they wnet in expecting to win and they should have but as always they couldnt take the heat of team that clearly wanted it more __________________________________________________ | |
| chipnchase23 ::: Favorites 2007-12-17 16:39:14 The AB's physical fitness was obviously fine, but in terms of game fitness, i.e combinations etc they weren't there. Hence the reason we lost the bloody game. Can't live in denial. And maybe most people couldn't coach and indoor netball, but can still have a opinion and mine is Henry has had his time and proved worthless, Deans should have had the job. __________________________________________________ | |
| Joelberg11 ::: Favorites 2007-12-17 07:20:22 its funny how a lot of people seem to think they know how to coach better than graham henry when they probily couldnt coach an indoor netball team __________________________________________________ | |
| Joelberg11 ::: Favorites 2007-12-17 07:18:38 their fitness had nothing to do with it __________________________________________________ | |
| chipnchase23 ::: Favorites 2007-12-16 22:33:46 Watching that France v AB's game anyone could tell once the pressure went on the AB's they had no answer, they weren't match fit. Why weren't they match fit? They didnt play in the Super 14. Why didn't they play in the Super 14? Henry said so. Now although Henry was in the bloody stand that game, the decisions he made before the most important game in 4 years were wrong. Its not a hard equation to work out. __________________________________________________ | |
| trigah01 ::: Favorites 2007-12-14 18:04:07 BUT henry didnt make the right selections... daniel carter souldnt have playd nick evans sould have and he showed he had a accurate boot more reliable then luke mcalisters... why did he keep keith robinson on he had no impact at all on the game and putting rookie brendon lenard or andrew ellis didnt help coz they couldnt take the pressure like piri weepu would have.. __________________________________________________ | |
| trigah01 ::: Favorites 2007-12-14 04:53:34 ummmmmmmm only if he drops the rotation policy and reconditioning programme, and doesnt cheapen the all black jersey again then yeah go hard!! i agree tho he said if he could go back he wouldnt change a thing!! relly he would go back and lose all over again.. __________________________________________________ | |
| Joelberg11 ::: Favorites 2007-12-11 08:06:49 yea mate i reakon all the players should have to earn their places back in the team during the super 14 or get the sack __________________________________________________ | |
| 09aDos ::: Favorites 2007-12-11 04:48:44 thank-you very much for pointing that out. every blames henry!why didn't they consider firing they guys who wear the black shirt, performing on the feild. it's like everyone forgot that if the PLAYERS decided to go for a drop kick we could of won! __________________________________________________ | |
| Joelberg11 ::: Favorites 2007-12-09 04:45:30 sir clive got another chance with basicly the same team from 1999 and look what happened in 2003. im a crusaders supporter from christchurch and i think deans would of made a great coach but im all for henry staying hes one of the best coaches nz has ever had and now hes had the perfect learning curve of losing a world cup __________________________________________________ | |
No comments:
Post a Comment